tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1986621680116407176.post2911347044267982428..comments2024-03-16T05:18:32.472-04:00Comments on 1973 Topps Photography: GaglianoChris Stufflestreethttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04229983444919282224noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1986621680116407176.post-62697152225447468792012-07-07T19:48:11.407-04:002012-07-07T19:48:11.407-04:00No, every card in the set that featured a player h...No, every card in the set that featured a player had a specific position, except for outfielders, who were all lumped together. There were ho silhouettes for Utility or bench players, no catch-all "Inf/OF" desingation. No pinch-hitters (which would have been awesome) or pinch-runners (which would have been even more awesome).Chris Stufflestreethttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04229983444919282224noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-1986621680116407176.post-69835514667322056432012-07-07T18:30:15.840-04:002012-07-07T18:30:15.840-04:00So, were there no cards in 1973 with a position of...So, were there no cards in 1973 with a position of "INFIELD"? It would be interesting to see what Topps did for perrenial "INFIELD" or "INF-OF" guys like Jim Stewart.Jim from Downingtownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01537007940455183397noreply@blogger.com